Disclaimer: This post is not aimed at spreading detestation, nor is this an attempt to differentiate the good, the bad and the ugly. I'm aiming to evaluate in a small detail how one of our leading vernacular dailies has been doing their business around with regard to the ethical principles in journalism. The views expressed here are personal and the links to the blogs provided in this article is for the purpose of a broader description, but I do not claim responsibility for all the statements in those posts. Read the full disclaimer before proceeding to read this article.Concluding, from Part I and Part II
The claim is pretty vociferous and veracious... Malayala Manorama is the most circulated newspaper in Kerala. It is ahead of its nearest opponent by over 5lakh copies (ABC 2008)

And the lead still keep climbing...
Manorama has a few points to their credit. It appears the most glitzy of all mallu dailies; it has an attractive makeup, is colourful and catchy, leads by miles in the quality of print and paper and sits pretty on a strong advertising cushion. Good for ém, sure!
Manorama is second to none in reporting business and development news, is forward-thinking when it comes to showcasing the state as an investment destination and is one of the well known Superbrands of Kerala. I like their Sports page, hosts a superlative 'Opportunities' supplement and dishes out a trendy 'Metro' pull-out in the bigger city editions. Not surprising at all, Manorama hosts the best online edition among all contemporary regional papers.
But wait a minute. Are we talking about a newspaper or a waxpaper here? Manorama is surely an 'intellectual product' and certainly not a 'material' one. And you take out the mundane features like colour and texture and look at MM in the right way, then you'd see why its no better than toilet-paper.
Have a look below to see how Manorama gets people to 'see' things. Below is the Manorama report of Pinarayi Vijayan's 'crowning' after the Navakerala march. The MM photographer's focus was on V.S. Achutanandan and his apparent disinterest with the proceedings. MM makes sure the point gets across by the tagline below the picture.

And see how Kerala Kaumudi has reported the same news. And hey, Achumama is all glued up into the action!

Images: Courtesy Sajith Vijayan, Rajith Mohan
I'm the last person to support our current CM Achuthanandan or his commie Govt, nor am I closing my eyes to the open war between the two senior comrades, but what kind of reporting is this? May be you could argue that it was the Kaumudi reporter who waited for the right time for his click, but given MMs track record this is another instance where it has created an avenue for sticking the hot rod onto the reds' ass.
Not the least surprising, given the history that the late godfather of this paper had vowed that he would commit suicide if a Communist Govt ever got elected in Kerala. Period.
The tradition is still kept alive by the new generation MM journos by news like "CPM activist's wife commits suicide" , "CPM supporter kicked his wife" (hyperbole) and so on...It isn't an exaggeration to say that Manorama and Deshabhimani will balance each other when it comes to biased reporting, you know what I'm talking about. Wonder if Congress will ever need another "Veekshanam" ?
The newspaper's wicked and shady deeds need just one undignified example: the ISRO Espionage Scandal that rocked the nation in the 90s. Who else could be behind such outrageous dreamwork rivaling the Hollywood fiction writers other than Manorama? The fairy tale cooked up by Manorama was taken over by other media and turned into a full-blown scandal. Spare a thought for the innocent souls, including the foreigners and the scientists, caught in the trap.
Recently, when the whole country was unanimous in condemning President George Bush and the United States for triggering another unnecessary and monstrous war in Iraq, Manorama shocked the entire state by exhibiting in the front page an emotional photograph of an American wife bidding a tearful farewell to her Marine hubby departing to destroy Iraq in a US warship!!! Disgraceful is a mild word to use here...What was MM thinking???
The accusations against the Manorama House doesn't end there. In the modern democratic era the word "lobbying" is as essential as it may sound obscene. Newspapers have their own regional preferences but Manorama is being constantly accused of playing the dirty regionalism card by torpedoing the developmental projects outside their turf.
When Infosys Technologies announced their interest on Kerala, MM jumped in with a clinical assessment of the locations Infosys considered and shortlisted their choice: Cochin. They even went on record with this one bit, totally exclusive which none of the other newspapers heard. When Minister Rajagopal proposed the Habitat Centre in Kowdiar, Manorama cited someone in the Finance Dept proposing to move the project to Cochin to help the project break-even early! Ditto with the Central University where what GoI wanted was 500 acres within 50km of an Int'l Airport. Manorama couldn't see beyond Malayattoor even when the Trichur location met the same criteria. When KCA announced the Cricket Stadium, MM came up with a report that 'officials' in BCCI had quoted that ''If not in Ernakulam, then nowhere in Kerala" WOW! The curious thing is that none of the other newspapers reported these 'demands', even though they were all present at the respective locales and conferences. So its logical to conclude that MM see and hear things which noone else does...
And lately,the finger has been pointed at the Manorama House for attempting to scuttle the Vizhinjam Port project for the favour of the business interests of their own backyard. Speak about the larger interests of the state!
This is what pisses me off to the maximum. Every newspaper has the right to be the patrons for their own niche, but could it only be done by annihilating the other locales? All these years I was reluctant to believe this one accusation against Manorama, but the Vizhinjam episode gave me first hand proof to see the truth. The personal account from one of my friends about the indifferent attitude of Manorama to report an awareness-campaign in favour of the port project put the newspaper in the right light, for me.
And Manorama, as shrewd as they are, pitches in with some seminars on Capital Development, Malabar Development and Coconut Development once a while, just for the namesake of it! Lets keep everybody happy, eh MM? and pull the plug from behind...Even weird is some of the social issues and moral policing taken up by Manorama and its team. True, there have been some instances where the media house has to be given credit for reports like "How Kerala behaves towards the fairer sex".But there is ample proof that Manorama pays some of the inept journos in Kerala who haven't the faintest idea what they're writing about. First a stir-up in Vanitha about how mobile phones are perpetrating social morality, then comes a teething attack on Bluetooth technology which created a wave of laughter among the techies. And now Manorama has jumped upon the major medium of communication, the email!!
What does Manorama want us to do? Lock our telephones, throw away the mobiles, discard laptops and computers and go back to the Damayanthi- Hamsam era?

To crown it all, have a peep as to how careful and technically impeccable MM dudes are with their reporting. C'mon, have a look and enjoy! The report is of Planning Commission Deputy Chairman M.S.Ahluwalia speaking about the Budget, and look whose pic is there instead of the man...Nithari serial murderer Mohinder Singh Panther! Oops!
How very Manorama-istic... :()
So Manorama, behind all those glitz and colour, is not a dependable organization. It faults at its basic function: taking the truth to the public. You can argue that truth depends on which angle you look at it from, but view it upside down or in 3D, Manorama still stinks. It is a glorified example of the most-sold not necessarily being the best.
There is little hope that Manorama will change for their own good. They have a force behind them which keeps them going, not talking about the poor subscribers here. And at times I feel that as Keralaites we deserve something better than this load of crap.
Hey..well written man...
ReplyDeleteWhen comes to lobbying of Nonorama ,the space wont be enough here.
The Vizhinjam example is the latest episode..such a poor piece of Journalism..
They know how to survive in the market.Capital development seminar,malabar devlopment seminar n all are just a part of it to make the people fools n happy.
Anyway ur post is forcing me to burn few more nonorama papers..
i tried this last time n the amout of satisfaction i got is beyond words...lol
Great post man
ReplyDeleteso many valid examples quoted that makes it clear like daylight, the farce that this newspaper is..
We've to form a movement against such irresponsible journalism
Amazing post ! following you:)
ReplyDeleteVery nice post. I have heard similar observations so I guess people are beginning to notice.
ReplyDeletebrilliant! i like the amount of research you've done here...things will change ;)
ReplyDeleteMan this is awesome! Right post at the right time and your research is neat across the posts. And you've shown a clear understanding of whats happening in recent history too. MM, KK et al.
ReplyDeleteA few of us have developed sore throats after talking about Manorama's clear stands against Trivandrum for over two years now. We are not talking about Nandakumar's Crime Magazine here, we are talking about Kerala's highest circulating news paper. If Manorama does not check this, it will not just be editorial discretion, but also a clear case of criminal media house conspiracy like the ISRO spy scandal you mentioned.
I was about to write a rejoinder for Ajay's post, but this one of yours surpasses expectations. Great!
@ Nishanth, I'd suggest you to put it in use in the toilet, instead of burning ;) eh?
ReplyDelete@ Praveen, irresponsible journalism? yes, of course. And totally moronic as well.
@ Rohit, thanks! see you again here :)
@ Silverine, I really do hope people get to know about this so-called newspaper and its true colours.
@ Cool Indian, you liked it, really? you concur?I thought you'd disagree.. ;) It was 'MM rocks' for you.. :)) Well, about that "things will change" part, I really do hope so
PS: I notice many of your posts have gone into the bin. You into constructive criticism? Don't tell me you're retiring. :)
@ BVN, oh how flattered am I! Thank you, and very happy that you liked it. :)That Crime Mag comparison was apt!
Good research done. I agree to most of your views here. As a leading paper manorama should improve their news standards. Their colour, print is good, its good for advertisers, is trendy, but is very very poor in reporting news!
ReplyDeleteWhat an awesome, well researched post!
ReplyDeleteI would like to believe that half of what you have said isn't true cos we have been subscribing to manorama at home for years!
But, I shall begin my own research now.
The series was fantastic!
@ Srishti, thanks for dropping by.
ReplyDelete@ Layman, dude, you and me and a huge volume of Keralaites are exposed to this newspaper every morning for the past few decades. So reading the most circulating daily isn't a crime, but with MM I'd think twice or thrice before taking it in. A newspaper is not like a Tea-powder, the choices are limited. People just want to read the news, none bothers to check what they read really transpired or not. But honestly, why should they?
The latest hot-dog joke of Deshabhimani, Im sure a good majority will believe it however ridiculous it appears. So if MM writes that so-and-so did this/said this, the people automatically gulp it down. You heard about the complaint the US Senator lodged with MM for publishing twisted viewpoints in his name? Well, thats a regular feature with MM.
Just for record, I like to read Manorama's reports on Sports, business, film etc and I like the professional make-up. But its in no way a dependable media house to know facts.
classic dude.......
ReplyDeleteI loved this line:
So Manorama, behind all those glitz and colour, is an incredibly seedy organization. It faults at its basic function: taking the truth to the public
-------------
it really really is a stupid paper.........
A good write-up, analysis, and critique...
ReplyDeleteIt is exactly what you have written. Manorama wants its readers to see what it sees. This should be what Pinarayi calls 'maadhyama syndicate'.
PS: I hate both Pinarayi and VS. :))
Well well and I was thinking am missing reading malayalam newspapers here. I think MM is taking the path of TOI?? glamour, glitz and scandals. I am not wise enough to comment on such a brilliantly researched post but can relate to what you were saying and kudos to u.
ReplyDeleteBtw congrats on becoming a dad...my reader was misbehaving very badly so missed a lot of posts of fellow bloggers...but now will be here to catch up on u regularly...
Many dailies have some influence to a political party.
ReplyDeleteAlso the views, choice of news all are the editor's choice. We buy manorama at my home town to get the 'dead' news. My dad even went to the extent of asking the newspaper vendor to give only the death notices page.
I used to read the hindu, but now after the elections I felt that Ram is more aligned to the CPi.
Hindu is the best newspaper in terms of opinions minus some cpi influence.
Kinda belated, but thanks for the support. The Manorama is crossing the line from a poor newspaper to a vindictive propaganda machine. It's about time we sat up and said that we know what they are up to!
ReplyDelete@ OG, I concur! :)
ReplyDelete@ Sreejith, Pinarayi may have his own itch with MM and thats going to be persistent. lol..
@ Sakshi, thank you for the greetings. :)
@ Xylene, yes Hindu has been fair on many many counts. I've not been reading it since I left India so cant opine about it now.
@ Ajay, thanks for the comments. MM has surely crossed the line with Vizhinjam. :X
Great post. Yes,Manorama stinks and all Malyalees should be ashamed of it.
ReplyDeleteWHA T YOU POSTED IS ABSOLUTELY TRUE. It is widely believed that the Publisher of Malayala Manorama is biased towards the Congress party and the publisher always supports the Indian National Congress and highlights the plus points of the Congress party alone. Yet another negative aspect is that the publisher blindly criticize the rulers of the State, unless they belong to political parties other than the Indian National Congress. But positive thing is that they publish true and correct information, irrespective of the high status and position of the corrupt persons working in high ranks.
ReplyDeleteGreat ροst! We will be linking to this grеat
ReplyDeleteartіcle on οur sitе. Κeеp uρ
the good ωriting.
Fееl free tο surf to my wеbsіte ::
http://www.title.com.br/